ASIC Takes Hollard Insurance to Court Over Significant Claim Handling Issues

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has initiated legal proceedings in the Federal Court against Hollard Insurance, alleging a breach of the duty of utmost good faith.

This action is in response to what ASIC describes as Hollard's "egregious" handling of a home and contents insurance claim filed by a couple from regional Victoria.

ASIC's case against Hollard revolves around the insurer's handling of the couple's claim following storm damage to their property in October 2021. The regulator claims Hollard's excessive delays and failure to conduct essential make-safe work have rendered the couple's home uninhabitable, leading to extensive moisture, mould, and decay issues that necessitate demolition and rebuilding.

Sarah Court, ASIC's deputy chair, highlighted the seriousness of the delays, stating that such prolonged inaction is unacceptable and potentially unlawful. The legal action aims to address growing concerns about increasing general insurance complaints and send a strong message about the unacceptability of such delays.

The claim, initially filed in October 2021, took Hollard nearly three and a half years to resolve. The insurer rejected the claim in April 2023, 18 months after its submission. Following this, the couple sought intervention from the Australian Financial Complaints Authority, which directed Hollard to provide compensation for non-financial losses and substantiated the storm as the proximate cause of the damage.

Hollard eventually consented to a cash settlement exceeding $1.5 million. However, ASIC contends that despite initially accepting the claim, Hollard delayed decisions regarding repairs, took over nine months to arrange a structural engineer inspection, and postponed the provision of temporary accommodation.

Responding to the legal action, a Hollard spokesperson acknowledged the proceedings and expressed support for ASIC's efforts in fostering consumer-positive outcomes. They noted Hollard's cooperation with ASIC but refrained from further commenting due to the ongoing nature of the legal matter.

Published:Monday, 14th Apr 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Café's Storm Damage Claim Reduced Due to Underinsurance

12 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

In a recent case, a café and catering business faced significant financial challenges after a storm forced its closure. The establishment ceased operations on August 28, 2024, and resumed on January 24, 2025, following repairs approved by their insurer, Suncorp. The insurer compensated the business with $280,570 for a year's gross profit loss and an additional $26,863 for increased operational costs. - read more

Insurer Ordered to Pay Arson Claim Despite Director's Past Convictions

12 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

A recent ruling by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has significant implications for restaurant owners and their insurance policies. An insurer was ordered to pay an arson claim it had initially denied, citing the restaurant's sole director's failure to disclose his criminal history during the policy's inception. - read more

Undisclosed Tenant Changes Result in Denied Insurance Claim for Landlord

12 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

A recent decision by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) highlights the importance of landlords accurately disclosing tenant activities to their insurers. In this case, a landlord's failure to inform their insurer, AIG, about a tenant's change from operating a restaurant to hosting religious meetings led to the denial of a substantial theft claim. - read more

Cafe's Underinsurance Leads to Reduced Storm Damage Payout

04 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

A recent case underscores the critical importance of ensuring adequate insurance coverage for businesses. A cafe and catering business, forced to close after a storm, faced a significant reduction in its insurance claim due to underinsurance. - read more

Insurer Ordered to Pay Restaurant's Arson Claim Amid Non-Disclosure Dispute

04 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

A recent ruling by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has significant implications for business insurance policies, particularly concerning the disclosure of directors' criminal histories. - read more

Click for more Insurance News

Restaurant Insurance Articles

How Your Claims History Affects Insurance Premiums for Restaurants

Running a restaurant in Australia comes with its own set of challenges, particularly when it comes to navigating legal risks. For restaurant owners, understanding these risks is crucial in safeguarding their businesses from potential financial hardships. - read more

Navigating the Insurance Landscape: Financial Strategies for Restaurant Owners

In the bustling world of hospitality, restaurant owners face a unique set of challenges that can impact their financial stability. From unexpected kitchen mishaps to customer accidents, understanding the unique risks in the hospitality industry is crucial. These risks can lead to significant financial burdens if not properly managed. - read more

The Legal Risks of Running a Restaurant: How Insurance Can Safeguard Your Business

Running a restaurant in Australia is exciting and full of potential, but it's not without its legal challenges. From compliance with food safety standards to managing employee relations, restaurant owners must navigate a complex web of regulations and potential legal issues. Issues such as slip and fall accidents, supplier disputes, and licensing can all pose significant risks. - read more

The Role of Staff Training in Reducing Liability Risks in Your Restaurant

Running a restaurant involves navigating a myriad of potential liabilities. From food safety issues to customer injuries on premises, the risks are numerous. In recent years, liability concerns have become even more pressing in the restaurant industry, as businesses face strict regulations and the potential for costly litigation. - read more

How to Choose the Right Insurance Coverage for Your Restaurant Business

Running a restaurant in Australia is both exciting and challenging. From crafting delightful dishes to ensuring an excellent dining experience, restaurant owners juggle multiple responsibilities daily. Amidst all these, securing adequate insurance coverage often takes a backseat, though it's crucial for the health of the business. - read more

Knowledgebase

Subrogation:
An insurance carrier may reserve the "right of subrogation" in the event of a loss. This means that the company may choose to take action to recover the amount of a claim paid to a covered insured if the loss was caused by a third party.

This website is owned and operated by Clark Family Pty Ltd (ACN 010 281 008) as Trustee for the Clark Family Trust (ABN 35 957 893 714), 43 Larch Street Tallebudgera QLD 4228. Clark Family Pty Ltd is an Authorised Representative (AR 1298860) of Unique Group Broker Services Pty Ltd (AFSL 509434) for financial product referrals and an Authorised Credit Representative (ACR 401491) of Saccasan Pty Ltd (ACL 386297). Check our licensing details on the ASIC registers: Clark Family Pty Ltd ACR, Clark Family Pty Ltd AR, Saccasan Pty Ltd, Unique Group Broker Services.

IMPORTANT: We do not provide financial product advice or credit assistance. We act solely as an introducer and refer enquiries to licensed third-party intermediaries, insurers, and lenders - with whom you can then deal directly. We may receive a fee or commission from these third parties in consideration for the referral. Before any action is taken to obtain a product or service referred to by this website, advice should be obtained (from either the third party to whom we refer you or from another qualified intermediary) as to the appropriateness of obtaining those products having regard to your objectives, financial situation and needs. Whilst we have our own process for validating the legitimacy of our referral partners, you should always verify the credentials of your financial adviser before proceeding with recommendations that they may present. Visit the ASIC website for further information.